BrenzuriStart free
Media industry

Wire copy, aggregation and AI drafts: three ways newsrooms fill the page

Each method has a cost, a speed and a failure mode. A comparison of how they source, how they attribute and who is accountable when a fact is wrong.

Written in Brenzuri 6 sources · 12 claims checked · 10 corroborated · 2 single-source

Three ways to fill a page

A newsroom that needs more copy than its reporters produce has three options. Buy a wire and print it. Aggregate: rewrite what other outlets reported, with a link. Or draft with a model from sources and have an editor approve. Each has a cost per article, a speed, and a characteristic way of being wrong.

The wire is the oldest and the most expensive per seat. †, a figure one outlet in this set reports, so it is attributed. What the wire buys is a named organisation accountable for every sentence.

How each one sources and attributes

Wire copy attributes to the agency and the agency's reporters; the paper adds nothing and vouches for nothing. Aggregation attributes to the original outlet, usually with a link, and adds a rewrite the aggregator is accountable for, which is where errors enter: paraphrase drifts, context is lost, the link goes dead. AI drafting from sources sits between the two. The draft attributes each claim to the outlets that support it, the editor is accountable for the approved version, and the source list is published with the text.

Speed runs in the opposite order. †; a wire story is instant; a sourced draft takes two to three minutes plus a review.

Who is accountable when a fact is wrong

With wire copy, the agency corrects and the paper reprints the correction. With aggregation, the original outlet may correct and the rewrite may not follow. With a sourced draft, the claim that was wrong has a source list attached, so the editor can see which outlet carried it and whether it was corroborated or flagged. That is not a guarantee of accuracy; it is a shorter path from the error to the decision that let it through.

† Single-source claim. Only one outlet in the source set reports this; the editor kept it with attribution. See the confidence report.

Frequently asked questions

Per article, yes, at one credit. Per seat and per year the comparison depends on volume; the source list gives the numbers this post used.

Sources · 6
  1. Reuters Institute — Journalism, media and technology trends 2025 · research
  2. Press Gazette — What a wire subscription costs · trade press
  3. Columbia Journalism Review — The aggregation economy · trade press
  4. Associated Press — Statement of news values and principles · official
  5. Nieman Lab — Aggregation, ten years on · trade press
  6. Poynter Institute — Corrections practices across newsrooms · research

Generated with sources, reviewed by a human: yes. Version 2, approved 24 Jul 2026 by A. Reyes.